Price: £320 / $430 USD | €380 EUR
Weight: 264 grams per shoe – Size 43
Sizes: 38-47
Colour: White
Cleat Compatability: Three bolt
I reviewed the Quoc Mono II biking shoe for my first ever piece of labor with Cyclingnews again in 2022, so when Quoc introduced its newest high-end highway biking footwear, the M3 Air, it appeared solely becoming that I ought to see how they in contrast.
Quoc launched the footwear alongside a collaboration with Geraint Thomas in March and we first noticed the Welsh star racing within the then-unreleased pair in February.
They prime the Quoc highway shoe vary, and have a full carbon sole and two-piece TPU (Thermoplastic polyurethane) higher. The footwear can be found in white solely and carry a retail worth of £320 / $430 placing them price-wise into one of the best biking shoe territory.
I’ve been using within the footwear for just a few months now. I’ve used them for brief spins, and arduous chain gangs, in dry and soaking moist climate, in addition to finishing my longest-ever journey in them just lately at 178 miles.
The M3 Airs appear to have gotten a good bit of traction post-launch from Quoc’s slick advertising and marketing and are being worn by a number of prime riders together with Ineos Grenadiers captain Thomas. They are a smooth, white biking shoe lover’s dream, however does the efficiency warrant the worth tag?
Design and aesthetics
What’s higher on a dry, summer season’s day than cruising together with some crisp white biking footwear and socks on? If you are of the identical thoughts, the M3 Airs will likely be proper up your road. Their smooth uppers and pretty minimal design once more remind me of the phrases I used to explain the Mono II footwear; slipper-like.
They have a single silver ‘Quoc’ and ‘M3 Air’ and ‘Q’ emblem and that is it. Quoc’s personal dual-closure dials are additionally white, which provides to the clear look. The footwear include a lightweight pink Quoc shoe bag within the field in addition to three completely different replaceable arch helps to assist riders fine-tune their match.
Design-wise, they use the identical carbon fibre sole because the Mono II. This has a single mesh vent within the forefoot and for reference, the rubber toe and heel pads have been very sturdy and look to be precisely the identical right here. Quoc additionally says the M3 Air was designed utilizing a brand new final, which provides elevated assist on the ball of the foot and area within the toe field.
Image 1 of 3
The M3 Air makes use of a two-piece TPU laminated higher which options refined, raised horizontal strains, it’s stitched collectively throughout the entrance of the shoe and joined on the rear. There are two massive mesh vents on the entrance of the shoe for ‘most aeration in high-intensity circumstances’. Apparently, the purpose of aeration got here up quite a bit relating to pro-rider suggestions to assist scale back foot swelling throughout races. The ‘tongueless’ design can also be current. There is not a standard tongue, the shoe materials wraps over the entrance of the foot and actually aids the clear styling.
The perforated sections of the shoe you’ll be able to see within the footage characteristic this mesh panelling beneath which could be seen when trying contained in the shoe however it’s largely coated over by the higher right here. Quoc has additionally launched an all-season toe cowl for the footwear’ vents in less-than-ideal circumstances, although I have never examined this as but. You can, after all, use another toe cowl however it might not cowl the vents as nicely.
The twin shoe closure dials sit parallel to one another, a structure that jogs my memory of the Specialized S-Works 7 footwear. The closure wire itself seems to be coated metallic wire as an alternative of the nylon used on the Mono II and does not really feel fairly as clean in use. Quoc informed me that it had widened the lace information to enhance foot assist, particularly to create fewer strain factors when sprinting and to be extra responsive.
I am unable to say I’ve felt any strain from the Mono II in over two years of fixed use and suppose I personally want the Mono II system. I feel this goes to point out how completely different riders’ ft are although: what works for one will not be proper for an additional.
Performance
I’ve gotten on very well with the M3 Air footwear. They look nice, have been snug from the off, fitted nicely sufficient and the carbon sole has felt stiff sufficient for my wants. I just like the light-weight and lean building together with the wraparound tongue they usually do really feel mild on the foot. Like every part I take a look at, I’ve carried out loads of using in them and used them in anger, they have not given me a single problem or downside.
The footwear are pretty slender in match, Quoc says the match is a bit racier, I measured the only real at its widest level at round 91mm. My personal ft are slender too so this hasn’t been a difficulty for me, however I think should you want a wider shoe, the M3 Air will not be good for you. The mesh panel on the within of the foot will truly enlarge any width points as it is simple to see and really feel your foot bone structure. Shoe match is private although and that is clearly going to fluctuate between riders.
The location of the twin closure dials and coated wire does not really feel tremendous clean to make use of in my view. I really feel you’ll be able to’t tighten the footwear down fairly as tightly or evenly as you may want generally, in comparison with a shoe just like the Northave Veloce Extreme which you’ll actually ratchet down. For me, the Mono II nylon wire feels a bit bit lighter to make use of, I can really feel this carrying one in every of every shoe to check and I feel the a number of closure factors on the Mono II permit for a barely snugger match. Heel retention feels about the identical because the Mono II for me, it isn’t tremendous cosy however hasn’t induced me any points, once more it is a private one.
White footwear imply cleansing and I’ve gotten on superb cleansing the footwear up. I’ve used child wipes, non-aggressive flooring wipes and a smooth toothbrush with washing up liquid (dish cleaning soap) after a grimy few hours at RideLondon. The mesh panels will darken which means they’ll want extra than simply wiping however mine got here up good and clear once more after a scrub with an outdated toothbrush. The texture within the TPU higher does imply it’s good to give the footwear a good wipe down or scrub to get them trying contemporary once more.
I am unable to actually say I’ve felt an enormous quantity of cooling from the mesh home windows although this doesn’t suggest it is not occurring. I’ve used the footwear in 20+ levels warmth and for over 10 hours of using the place my ft did keep snug. I’ve had a few ethereal moments however I am unable to say the M3 Airs have taken air flow to a brand new stage. I perceive suppose that is going to be a reasonably private factor from rider to rider although.
Value
The M3 Air retails for £320, which is dear nonetheless you slice it, and a rise of £50 over the Mono II. £320, nonetheless, is on a par with loads of different premium highway footwear in the marketplace proper now.
As a fast comparability, they’re cheaper than the top-end Northwave Veloce Extreme and Nimbl Ultimate, a shoe favoured by plenty of Thomas’ WorldTour rivals at present.
The footwear do really feel good, and have not given me an oz. of hassle. I simply do not know in the event that they characterize an enormous enchancment in efficiency over the Mono II for the additional £50 spent. The Mono II is being phased out I perceive, so do not count on to see it round eternally. Quoc did additionally inform me extra iterations of the M3 will likely be launched sooner or later.
Verdict
I like the aesthetics the M3 Air footwear deliver to the desk. I do not suppose my dream biking footwear could be a lot completely different if I designed them myself.
I’ve discovered the footwear to be snug, and have skilled zero hotspots, rubbing or discomfort of any sort and the footwear have supported my ft nicely when using arduous.
I feel the closure dial placement and the space between the dial and wire loop do not provide as a lot vary of adjustment and result in a much less foot-hugging match than some footwear. If they suit your ft and give you the results you want I do not suppose you will have a difficulty however should you discover they’re a bit massive volume-wise to your ft, the adjustment and retention on provide will not be sufficient and go away you wanting extra.
Attributes | Notes | Rating |
Design and aesthetics | Excellent aesthetics, significantly should you like white footwear. I really feel the dial location and effectiveness may very well be a bit bit higher | 7/10 |
Comfort | Comfortable for me, zero points or discomfort | 8/10 |
Weight | 264 grams for a 43 is comptetitive, barely heavier than the Mono II on my scales | 8/10 |
Stiffness | No stifness claims, however the carbon sole goes to be stiff sufficient for many. Uppers are pretty malleable | 8/10 |
Value | Expensive at £320 however consistent with prime highway footwear today. Is the £50 leap justified? | 7/10 |